When Is a Budget Not a Budget?

The budgeting process is undergoing a lot of change right now; please let us know what you think about some recent proposals

If you happen to monitor trends within global corporate finance teams, you are likely aware that many firms are changing their budgeting processes. They have implemented rolling forecasts or taken a “later, lighter” approach to their budgets (which sees the finance team start its budgeting later and requires fewer inputs from the businesses). And some hardy souls have actually abandoned their budgets altogether.


Time for a Refresh

However, changing the activities of the budgeting process might not go far enough. Some corporate controllers tell us that they actually want to do away with the word “budget”. The reason for this (as with so many good solutions to business problems) is that these controllers have spent time working out the root cause of their dissatisfaction. As one client puts it excellently in this online discussion thread (see the last post in the list; open to all CEB clients), the corporate budget typically aims to do a mix of three things when it should really only do the third:

  1. Forecasting: Predict what will happen in the next year or longer
  2. Performance Management: Set targets and reward performance
  3. Resource Allocation: Support fixed costs and investments

As we have argued in the past, forecasting is all important and should be done regularly and frequently with division heads and other senior line managers. However, some controllers want to challenge this common corporate belief that forecasting should be a necessary part of the budgeting process. Controllers are also very keen to change the stubbornly rooted idea that the budget should be used as a type of performance contract; the main clause being, “if you achieve this target, we will consider you a success.” This performance contract approach obviously leads to gaming and various other types of numerical manipulation from the line.

The desire to clarify what the budget is and isn’t leads to the desire to change its name to something else. And this is where you come in.


We’d Like to Hear From You…

One client has told us that he’s thinking of changing the word “budget” to “the target”; another was adamant that he wasn’t going to use the word budget but was at a loss as to what to call it instead. We’d like to hear your thoughts – and we’ll obviously publish them below too.

  • If you are taking steps to change your budgeting process, do you think that changing the name will improve the way the process is seen?
  • Also, if you were to change the name (or if you have already) then what would you call it instead?

If you are a client and want to discuss this further, then please don’t hesitate to contact me.


3 Responses to “When Is a Budget Not a Budget?”

P N Mulgund Said:

“Budget” signifies a goal-post, an aspiration to achieve some thing better, or higher than what today we are at. Budget captures an urge to change voluntarily some aspect of current condition, rather than merely reflecting on the current state of affairs, though it is one of the major factors determining the budget.

We should not mix the same with short term forecast or target which is more aligned to the given current situation.

Hence, I feel both need to co-exist, though the management’s obsession with the budget should reduce when it comes to reckoning it as the only barometer for rewards.

Comment made on July 9th, 2010 at 3:00 pm
Gerald Nanninga Said:

The main reason for doing the budget is for treasury purposes–to know how much money you will need and how much will come out of the business (vs. how much has to come from elsewhere). Also, banks and other creditors often demand this type of document.

Therefore, if I had to remname it, I’d call it the “cash flow guide” or something similar.

Comment made on July 9th, 2010 at 6:27 pm
Paul Dennis Said:

Thank you for the great suggestions. It seems that the budget as we know it is falling short as both a means to accurately forecast cash-flow and simultaneously reward performance.

While a rebranding may seem a bit cosmetic, it sends a signal of what the budget should and should not do and may serve as a timely reminder to stakeholders who might have forgotten or adopted bad habits.

Comment made on July 12th, 2010 at 3:35 pm
 

Leave a Comment